Cross-Laminated Timber (CLT) Construction: Engineered Mass Timber for Commercial and Multifamily
Cross-Laminated Timber (CLT) is engineered mass timber product made from layers of dimensional lumber stacked perpendicular and glued together. Enables substantial wood construction including tall buildings (up to 18 stories under IBC 2021). Substantial building codes recognition through IBC 2021+ Type IV-A (highest), IV-B, IV-C tall wood classifications. Sustainable alternative to concrete and steel with substantial embodied carbon advantages. Understanding CLT helps construction firms evaluate this growing structural option.
This post covers cross-laminated timber construction.
CLT production specific:
CLT production
- Dimensional lumber layers (3, 5, 7+ layers)
- Perpendicular orientation each layer
- Glued with structural adhesive
- Pressed under substantial pressure
- Specific to manufacturer (Structurlam, Nordic, KLH)
- ANSI/APA PRG 320 standard
CLT production specific process. Dimensional lumber layers (typically 1x4, 1x6) in 3, 5, 7, or more layers. Perpendicular orientation each layer (alternating directions) creating two-dimensional strength. Glued with structural adhesive. Pressed under substantial pressure curing adhesive. Specific to manufacturer including Structurlam, Nordic Structures, KLH (European), others. ANSI/APA PRG 320 standard governs production and quality.
Building codes recognize CLT:
Building code recognition
- IBC 2021 added Type IV-A, IV-B, IV-C
- Type IV-A up to 18 stories
- Type IV-B up to 12 stories
- Type IV-C up to 9 stories
- Specific encapsulation requirements
- Substantial design flexibility
- Specific to building height
Building codes recognize CLT substantially. IBC 2021 added Type IV-A, IV-B, IV-C tall wood construction types. Type IV-A up to 18 stories with full encapsulation (gypsum protection). Type IV-B up to 12 stories with partial encapsulation. Type IV-C up to 9 stories with less encapsulation. Specific encapsulation requirements protecting CLT from fire (provides additional fire resistance). Substantial design flexibility within types. Specific to building height with corresponding fire protection.
CLT applications growing:
Applications
- Multifamily residential
- Office buildings
- Educational facilities
- Hospitality
- Walls, floors, roofs
- Hybrid systems (CLT + steel/concrete)
- Specific to project goals
CLT applications growing substantially. Multifamily residential substantial market. Office buildings increasingly. Educational facilities. Hospitality projects. Walls, floors, roofs all CLT applications. Hybrid systems combining CLT with steel and concrete (CLT floors on concrete podium, steel frame with CLT decking). Specific to project goals — sustainability, schedule, aesthetics drive selection.
Sustainability substantial benefit:
Sustainability benefits
- Carbon sequestration (wood stores carbon)
- Substantially lower embodied carbon vs concrete/steel
- Renewable resource (sustainable forestry)
- Specific carbon accounting
- LEED credits available
- ESG positive
Get AP insights in your inbox
A short monthly roundup of construction AP + accounting posts. No spam, ever.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Sustainability substantial CLT benefit. Carbon sequestration — wood stores carbon during growth (1 tonne CO2 per cubic meter typical). Substantially lower embodied carbon vs concrete/steel — 30-50% reduction typical for primary structure. Renewable resource through sustainable forestry. Specific carbon accounting per LCA (Life Cycle Assessment). LEED credits available for material selection. ESG positive substantially differentiating from concrete/steel.
Construction process distinct:
Construction process
- Prefabricated panels (substantial)
- Just-in-time delivery typical
- Crane installation
- Specific to design
- Faster than concrete typical
- Substantial coordination during design
Construction process distinct from concrete/steel. Prefabricated panels substantial — panels manufactured offsite to specific dimensions. Just-in-time delivery typical given panel size and storage requirements. Crane installation similar to precast concrete. Specific to design — panel sizes, openings predetermined. Faster than concrete typically — days vs weeks for floor cycle. Substantial coordination during design — changes after panel manufacture difficult.
Cost competitive:
Cost considerations
- Substantial vs traditional
- Comparable to concrete (sometimes)
- Faster construction (carrying cost savings)
- Reduced foundation (lighter weight)
- Specific to project economics
- Sustainability premium sometimes
Cost considerations vary. Substantial cost vs traditional methods sometimes (CLT material substantial). Comparable to concrete sometimes when accounting for total project. Faster construction produces carrying cost savings. Reduced foundation requirements due to lighter weight (CLT lighter than concrete). Specific to project economics. Sustainability premium sometimes accepted by owners pursuing ESG goals.
CLT construction substantial growth in US market with code recognition and sustainability priorities. Quality CLT-experienced design teams (architects, structural engineers) and contractors substantially better outcomes. Specialty CLT contractors emerging. Coordination during design critical given prefabrication. Quality early integration of CLT decision into project planning supports successful delivery.
Cross-laminated timber engineered mass timber enabling substantial wood construction. CLT production layered dimensional lumber with structural adhesive. Building code recognition through IBC 2021 Type IV-A, IV-B, IV-C up to 18 stories. Applications growing across multifamily, office, education, hospitality. Sustainability substantial benefit through carbon sequestration. Construction process distinct with prefabrication. Cost considerations vary. For construction firms, CLT growing structural option deserving attention. Quality early adoption positions firms for emerging market. Sustainability priorities driving substantial market growth.
Written by
Marcus Reyes
Construction Industry Lead
Spent twelve years running AP at a $120M general contractor before joining Covinly. Lives in the world of AIA G702/G703, retainage schedules, and lien waiver deadlines. Writes about the construction-specific workflows that generic AP tools get wrong.
View all posts