Construction Mergers and Acquisitions: How Construction Firms Buy and Sell to Drive Growth and Succession
Construction M&A drives growth, geographic expansion, capability development, and succession. Substantial M&A activity in industry with substantial private equity involvement and consolidation among GCs and trade contractors. Distinct industry considerations include bonding capacity transfer (substantial issue), license requirements (state-specific), backlog valuation, and goodwill challenges (relationship-based business). Strategic, financial, and operational considerations affect deals. Understanding M&A helps construction firms evaluate strategic options.
This post covers construction mergers and acquisitions.
Multiple drivers for M&A:
M&A drivers
- Growth (faster than organic)
- Geographic expansion
- Capability development (specialty)
- Succession (owner exit)
- Talent acquisition
- Customer relationships
- Bonding capacity
- Specific to firm strategy
Multiple drivers for construction M&A. Growth faster than organic through acquired revenue. Geographic expansion entering new markets via acquisition vs greenfield. Capability development through specialty acquisition. Succession providing owner exit when no internal successor. Talent acquisition through firm purchase. Customer relationships transferring with acquisition. Bonding capacity sometimes increased through combined balance sheets. Specific to firm strategy and circumstances.
Buyer types vary:
Buyer types
- Strategic buyers (other construction firms)
- Private equity (substantial activity)
- ESOPs (employee ownership)
- Family successors
- Management buyouts
- Specific to circumstances
- Different valuations and structures
Buyer types vary by transaction. Strategic buyers (other construction firms) most common — industry knowledge, synergies. Private equity substantial activity in construction roll-ups creating substantial platforms. ESOPs (Employee Stock Ownership Plans) transferring to employees. Family successors when generational transfer. Management buyouts when senior managers acquire. Specific to circumstances and seller preferences. Different valuations and structures per buyer type.
Valuation methods construction-specific:
Valuation methods
- EBITDA multiple (most common)
- Asset-based
- Discounted cash flow (DCF)
- Industry comparables
- Substantial backlog value sometimes
- Specific to firm characteristics
- Multi-year average EBITDA typical
Valuation methods construction-specific. EBITDA multiple most common (typically 4-8x for construction depending on quality). Asset-based for asset-heavy firms. Discounted cash flow (DCF) for substantial transactions. Industry comparables provide benchmarks. Substantial backlog value sometimes added. Specific to firm characteristics including profitability, growth, customer base. Multi-year average EBITDA typical (3-year average) smoothing volatility.
Bonding transfer challenge:
Bonding capacity transfer
- Bonding tied to surety relationship
- Buyer's surety reviews acquired firm
- Capacity may decrease or increase
- Substantial issue for valuation
- Surety involvement during deal
- Specific to combined firm
- Quality due diligence
Bonding capacity transfer substantial M&A challenge. Bonding tied to surety relationship not transferable directly. Buyer's surety reviews acquired firm and combined position. Capacity may decrease or increase depending on combined financial strength. Substantial issue for valuation — capacity affects future revenue. Surety involvement during deal essential. Specific to combined firm financial position. Quality due diligence on bonding capacity affects valuation.
Get AP insights in your inbox
A short monthly roundup of construction AP + accounting posts. No spam, ever.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
License transfer state-specific:
License requirements
- Contractor licenses state-specific
- Asset purchase vs stock purchase affects
- Qualifying individual transitions
- Specific state procedures
- Substantial state-by-state work
- Specific timing considerations
License transfer state-specific. Contractor licenses state-specific with varying transfer rules. Asset purchase vs stock purchase affects — stock often preserves license, asset may require re-application. Qualifying individual transitions when person leaves. Specific state procedures including filings, fees, examinations sometimes. Substantial state-by-state work for firms in multiple states. Specific timing considerations for license preservation.
Backlog and customers affect value:
Backlog and customer
- Backlog provides visibility
- Customer concentration risk
- Repeat customer value
- Specific contracts (assignability)
- Project profitability
- Specific to contracts
- Substantial valuation factor
Backlog and customers affect value substantially. Backlog provides revenue visibility into future. Customer concentration risk — substantial revenue from one customer is risk. Repeat customer value substantial — long-term relationships valuable. Specific contracts affect assignability — some contracts can't transfer without consent. Project profitability — backlog at attractive margins more valuable. Specific to contracts. Substantial valuation factor in construction M&A.
Goodwill challenges substantial:
Goodwill challenges
- Relationship-based business
- Personal goodwill (founder) vs corporate
- Customer relationships may not transfer
- Employee relationships
- Tax treatment differences
- Specific to business model
Goodwill challenges substantial in construction. Relationship-based business with substantial personal connections. Personal goodwill (founder) vs corporate goodwill distinction — personal not transferable, corporate is. Customer relationships may not transfer if tied to specific person. Employee relationships affect retention. Tax treatment differences between personal and corporate goodwill (substantial). Specific to business model — founder-led firms have substantial personal goodwill.
Construction M&A success requires substantial preparation — quality financial records, clean operations, key person retention plans, and customer relationship transition substantially affect value and outcomes. Quality preparation 1-2+ years before sale produces optimal outcomes. Rushed sales typically discount substantially. Worth substantial attention from substantial firms considering exit.
Construction M&A drives growth, expansion, capability, succession. Multiple drivers including growth, geography, capability, succession, talent. Buyer types include strategic, private equity, ESOPs, family, management. Valuation methods include EBITDA multiple (4-8x typical), asset-based, DCF. Bonding capacity transfer substantial challenge. License requirements state-specific. Backlog and customers affect value. Goodwill challenges substantial in relationship-based business. For construction firms, quality M&A preparation substantially affects outcomes. Quality timing, preparation, advisory team essential. Worth substantial attention as strategic option.
Written by
Marcus Reyes
Construction Industry Lead
Spent twelve years running AP at a $120M general contractor before joining Covinly. Lives in the world of AIA G702/G703, retainage schedules, and lien waiver deadlines. Writes about the construction-specific workflows that generic AP tools get wrong.
View all posts